Air and Vapor Control Membranes
Orientation for air and vapour control membranes, drawn from different sections of the building-envelope guide than the water-resistive barrier page.
Buyer summary
- What it is
- Membranes and coatings that control air leakage (air barriers) and/or water-vapour diffusion (vapour retarders) through walls, roofs and floors. Each function needs its own evidence.
- Main applications
- Residential, commercial and industrial walls, roofs and floors, including cold-storage and controlled-humidity spaces.
- Critical purchasing specifications
- Required function: air barrier, vapour retarder or both
- Air permeance for the material (ASTM E2178) and the assembly (ASTM E2357), against the code in force
- Vapour-retarder class, measured by ASTM E96 dry cup
- Climate zone and assembly
- Transitions, penetrations and accessory compatibility
- Qualification considerations
- Continuity matters most for air barriers. Placement of a vapour retarder depends on climate, assembly and drying potential, and no universal rule applies.
- First step
- Describe the assembly, the climate zone, the interior conditions and the code that applies.
- How PAXOMER can assist
- Air and vapour control is an assembly decision with code and climate consequences. PAXOMER can help capture permeance, air-leakage and compatibility requirements, identify membrane manufacturers with relevant constructions and documentation, and coordinate samples. We can support manufacturer-level commercial discussions once the technical and documentation route is agreed. Manufacturer identification, qualification support and pricing discussions depend on manufacturer confirmation, specifications, quantities and terms.
Detailed technical guidance, data tables, FAQs and technical references follow below.
Building-envelope and fire-performance decisions. Thermal, moisture and fire performance depend on the complete assembly and the code path that applies. They require qualified design review and documented evidence for that assembly; material data alone do not establish compliance.
General technical information published by PAXOMER Inc. to support preliminary material evaluation. It is compiled from the sources cited on this page and has not been independently reviewed or certified by a professional engineer, laboratory or certification body. Values marked typical, illustrative or requiring confirmation are not specifications. Confirm properties, standard editions, regulatory status and suitability for your specific application with the manufacturer and, where the use is regulated or safety-related, with a qualified professional or the relevant authority.
Air barriers and vapour retarders are control layers in a building envelope. They are often confused because one membrane can serve both roles, but they control different things: an air barrier limits air leakage, which carries heat and moisture, and a vapour retarder limits moisture moving by diffusion. Which layer is needed, where it sits and how permeable it should be depend on the wall or roof assembly and the climate. No membrane is right for every assembly, and a single permeance figure says little without knowing the assembly around it.
This page is general technical orientation for envelope manufacturers, specifiers, contractors and buyers. It explains the vocabulary, sets out the air-permeance and vapour-class figures found in the sources read, covers continuity and penetrations and describes how to qualify a product. It is not code advice or a design; the design professional, the adopted code and the product’s evaluation report decide. PAXOMER does not state that it stocks, represents or has qualified any air or vapour membrane.
A. Product identity and terminology
1. What are building-envelope control layers?
Control layers manage the flow of water, air, vapour and heat through the envelope. The water-control layer (the water-resistive barrier) sheds liquid water, the air-control layer limits air leakage, the vapour-control layer limits diffusion and the thermal-control layer is the insulation (S4). One membrane may serve more than one role, but each role must be designed and shown to work. Water control is covered on Water-resistive barriers; the guide Construction membranes for the building envelope covers the family, and the comparison Water-resistive barrier versus air barrier sets the roles side by side.
2. How is an air barrier different from a vapour retarder?
| Feature | Air barrier | Vapour retarder |
|---|---|---|
| Controls | Air leakage (bulk flow driven by pressure) | Vapour diffusion (driven by vapour pressure difference) |
| Key property | Air permeance of the material and the assembly | Water-vapour permeance (perms) |
| Continuity | Critical; gaps defeat it (S4) | Less critical; lapped seams can suffice (S4) |
| Position | Anywhere in the assembly if continuous and supported against wind loads | Depends on climate and assembly |
| Typical products | Taped housewrap, self-adhered or fluid-applied membranes, sealed sheathing, sealed gypsum | Polyethylene sheet, kraft facing, coatings, membranes |
Source basis: S1, S2, S4; qualitative summary.
3. Where are these membranes used?
In walls, roofs and floors of residential, commercial and industrial buildings, including cold-storage and controlled-humidity spaces. Each assembly needs its own analysis of where moisture can come from and where it can dry. Roofing carriers are covered on PET spunbond roofing carriers.
4. When is a membrane suitable, and when not?
Reasonable candidates: products with air-permeance and vapour-permeance data under stated methods, tested assembly details and clear accessory systems for laps, penetrations and transitions.
Weak candidates: a vapour-impermeable layer placed where it traps moisture in the assembly, a membrane with no continuity detail at windows and penetrations, or one chosen from permeance alone without assembly analysis.
5. Which terms will I meet?
Air barrier, air permeance, air leakage rate, perm, permeance, vapour retarder, Class I/II/III, dry cup, wet cup, condensation, wetting and drying potential, climate zone, control layer, continuity, ABAA, ASTM E2178, ASTM E2357, ASTM E96. Glossary: density.
B. Properties and performance
6. What air-permeance figures are cited?
The Air Barrier Association of America (ABAA) approval-process document for mechanically fastened commercial building wraps states a maximum air permeance of 0.004 cfm/ft² (0.02 L/(s·m²)) at a pressure difference of 1.57 psf (75 Pa), for specimens as received, tested to ASTM E2178-11, with no minimum listed (S5). For assemblies, a manufacturer technical note (S6) states that the maximum allowable rate required by most codes is 0.2 L/(s·m²) (0.04 cfm/ft²) at 75 Pa, tested to ASTM E2357, which is ten times the material limit, using 2.4 m × 2.4 m (8 ft × 8 ft) specimens and a loading protocol with sustained pressures of ±600 Pa, cyclic pressures of ±800 Pa and gust loads of ±1200 Pa; a second manufacturer page gives the same assembly figure (S1). The ABAA document did not state an assembly limit, so the assembly figure rests on manufacturer statements and the code text must be checked. ASTM E2178 tests a material; ASTM E2357 tests an assembly that includes joints, penetrations and transitions, which is why assembly limits are less strict per unit area than the limit on the material alone. Passing E2178 shows a material can serve as an air barrier, not how it and its accessories perform as a system (S6).
Air permeance limits as cited
Material limit read in an ABAA process document; assembly limit from manufacturer statements. Code limits in force were not read. Not product data.
| Property | Value or range | Unit | Test conditions | Test method | Grade or construction | Source | Verification status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air-barrier material, maximum | 0.02 (0.004 cfm/ft²) | L/(s·m²) | At 75 Pa; specimen as received; mechanically fastened commercial wraps | ASTM E2178-11 | ABAA approval criteria, all materials in that category | S5 | Verified reference value (published source) |
| Air-barrier assembly, maximum | 0.2 (0.04 cfm/ft²) | L/(s·m²) | At 75 Pa at end of loading protocol; 2.4 m × 2.4 m specimen | ASTM E2357 | Stated as the limit in most codes (manufacturer statement) | S1, S6 | Manufacturer-specific value (one grade) |
Example manufacturer test results
From one manufacturer's technical note on liquid-applied systems. These are that manufacturer's results with its own accessories, not typical values for any class of product.
| Property | Value or range | Unit | Test conditions | Test method | Grade or construction | Source | Verification status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material air leakage, four named coatings tested on CMU or felt substrates | below 0.001 to 0.002 | L/(s·m²) | At 75 Pa | ASTM E2178 | Four named coatings of one manufacturer | S6 | Manufacturer-specific value (one grade) |
| Assembly air leakage, four named systems | 0.011 to 0.016 | L/(s·m²) | At 75 Pa; accessories on joints, fasteners and transitions only | ASTM E2357 | Four named systems of one manufacturer | S6 | Manufacturer-specific value (one grade) |
7. How are vapour retarders classified?
The International Code Council’s technical note TN06, citing the 2015 International Residential Code (R202, R702.7), defines Class I as 0.1 perm or less, Class II as above 0.1 and up to 1.0 perm and Class III as above 1.0 and up to 10 perms, with classes for typical materials determined by ASTM E96 dry-cup testing (S3); a control-layer handout repeats the classes (S4). The note gives sheet polyethylene and unperforated aluminium foil as Class I examples, kraft-faced fibreglass batts as Class II and latex or enamel paint as Class III, and warns that standard painted drywall is often over 10 perms and should not be counted as a Class III retarder unless the paint is rated at 10 perms or less; a given product’s class must come from its own test data (S3). Class requirements vary by climate zone and wall type in the code, and some assemblies allow or require none. The edition and local amendments must be checked.
Vapour retarder classes as cited
From ICC technical note TN06 citing the 2015 IRC; the current code edition and Canadian requirements were not checked. Not a product specification.
| Property | Value or range | Unit | Test conditions | Test method | Grade or construction | Source | Verification status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class I vapour retarder | 0.1 or less | perm | Dry-cup conditions | ASTM E96 dry cup | 2015 IRC classification | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
| Class II vapour retarder | above 0.1 up to 1.0 | perm | Dry-cup conditions | ASTM E96 dry cup | 2015 IRC classification | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
| Class III vapour retarder | above 1.0 up to 10 | perm | Dry-cup conditions | ASTM E96 dry cup | 2015 IRC classification | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
8. How does climate zone change the choice?
For the 2015 IRC, TN06 reports that in cold climates (Marine 4 and zones 5 to 8) a Class I or II vapour retarder is required on the interior side of frame walls, but a Class III retarder is permitted where the listed vented cladding or continuous insulation is used; warm-humid, mixed-humid and other zones carry no IRC vapour-retarder requirement in that document, which does not list requirements for zones 1 to 4 except 4C (S3). Continuous insulation counted for this purpose must meet the minimum R-values in the table, and spray foam applied to the interior side of exterior sheathing qualifies if it is 1.5 perm or less at the stated R-value. Edition changes and local amendments alter these rules, and Canadian practice differs, so the code table in force and, where warranted, a hygrothermal analysis decide.
Cold-climate Class III options in the 2015 IRC as summarised in TN06
From ICC technical note TN06 citing the 2015 IRC; later editions and Canadian codes were not checked. Illustrative of how requirements scale with climate, not a design rule.
| Property | Value or range | Unit | Test conditions | Test method | Grade or construction | Source | Verification status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine 4, vented cladding option | Over wood structural panels, fibreboard or gypsum | not applicable | Class III permitted with vented cladding | Code table | 2015 IRC | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
| Marine 4, continuous insulation option | at least R-2.5 over 2×4 or R-3.75 over 2×6 | R-value | Class III permitted | Code table | 2015 IRC | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
| Zone 5, continuous insulation option | at least R-5 over 2×4 or R-7.5 over 2×6 | R-value | Class III permitted | Code table | 2015 IRC | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
| Zone 6, continuous insulation option | at least R-7.5 over 2×4 or R-11.25 over 2×6 | R-value | Class III permitted | Code table | 2015 IRC | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
| Zones 7 and 8, continuous insulation option | at least R-10 over 2×4 or R-15 over 2×6 | R-value | Class III permitted | Code table | 2015 IRC | S3 | Verified reference value (published source) |
9. How does condensation control work?
Condensation occurs when moist air meets a surface below its dew point. Air leakage can carry far more moisture into an assembly than diffusion, which is why air-barrier continuity is often the more important first step (S4). The vapour retarder limits diffusion into the assembly, and the assembly must be able to dry in at least one direction. TN06 notes that where continuous exterior insulation meets the minimum R-value a Class I or II retarder is generally not required, and that Class I is not recommended there to avoid a double vapour barrier (S3). A second low-permeance layer on the other side can trap moisture; the “double Class II” situation (two low-permeance layers enclosing the wall) is a known caution in the handout and must be avoided unless analysis supports it (S4).
Permeance of some insulating materials as shown in TN06
From ICC technical note TN06 (Table 2 as summarised by the extraction). Product permeance varies by product, thickness and facing; these are illustrative and not product data.
| Property | Value or range | Unit | Test conditions | Test method | Grade or construction | Source | Verification status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expanded polystyrene, 1 in. | 2 to 4 | perm | Dry cup | ASTM E96 dry cup | Generic material, Class III | S3 | Typical illustrative range |
| Extruded polystyrene, unfaced, 1 in. | 0.8 | perm | Dry cup | ASTM E96 dry cup | Generic material, Class II | S3 | Typical illustrative range |
| Polypropylene-faced extruded polystyrene | 0.1 or less | perm | Dry cup | ASTM E96 dry cup | Faced product, Class I | S3 | Typical illustrative range |
10. Does a retarder go on the interior or the exterior?
It depends. The location of the air barrier is flexible if it is continuous and supports wind loads; the vapour retarder’s location depends on climate and the temperature profile of the assembly (S4). Exterior insulation can keep the sheathing warm and change the answer. Use the code’s assembly options or an analysis, not a rule of thumb.
11. Why do continuity and penetrations matter?
An air barrier is only as good as its weakest joint. The handout stresses continuity at laps, corners, transitions between wall and roof, windows, doors and penetrations for pipes and wires, and notes taped housewrap or sealed membranes are used where the air-barrier role is assigned to them (S4). Assembly tests under ASTM E2357 include these details. The vapour retarder tolerates lapped seams better.
12. Which mechanical properties matter?
Tensile and tear strength for handling, puncture resistance, adhesion for self-adhered products, resistance to wind-load deflection and creep, and compatibility with tapes and sealants. For an air barrier supporting wind loads, deflection under pressure is a design question. Ask for data and methods; this page gives no numbers.
13. Which standards are named in the sources?
- ASTM E2178: air permeance of building materials (S1, S2).
- ASTM E2357: air leakage of air-barrier assemblies (S1, S2).
- ASTM E96: water-vapour transmission of materials; dry-cup and wet-cup procedures (S3).
- ICC-ES evaluation reports and acceptance criteria (referenced generally).
The standards themselves were not read; the editions and any withdrawn status must be checked.
14. How should different membrane types be compared?
| Approach | Reported role | Points to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Taped polymer housewrap | WRB and, when taped and tested, air barrier (S4) | Air-permeance data; tape and detail system |
| Self-adhered membrane | Air barrier, WRB and sometimes vapour retarder | Permeance class; cold-weather installation; compatibility |
| Fluid-applied membrane | Air barrier and WRB, seamless | Thickness control; curing; permeance |
| Polyethylene sheet | Class I retarder; air barrier if sealed | Drying potential; sealing at laps and penetrations |
| Smart or variable-permeance membrane | Retarder whose permeance changes with humidity | Product-specific data and assembly analysis |
Source basis: S1 to S4; qualitative and not a ranking.
C. Manufacturing and processing
15. How are these membranes made?
Polymer sheets are extruded, laminated or coated; nonwoven housewraps are spunbond or flash-spun; self-adhered membranes combine a carrier film with a bitumen or polymer adhesive and a release liner; fluid-applied membranes are mixed products cured on site. Details are proprietary; ask for a product description and test data. See also Silicone release liners for the liner of self-adhered products.
16. What installation points commonly decide performance?
- Surface preparation and priming for adhesion; temperature limits for self-adhered products.
- Lap widths, sealing and detailing at transitions and penetrations.
- Compatible tapes, sealants and flashings only.
- Protection from UV and damage before closing in.
- Inspection and testing, such as a blower-door test, after installation.
Source basis: S4 and general practice; follow the product’s installation guide.
17. What failures appear and how are they diagnosed?
| Observed problem | Possible cause | Check |
|---|---|---|
| High air leakage in blower-door test | Gaps at laps, penetrations, transitions | Locate leaks (smoke, thermography); review details |
| Condensation or mould in cavity | Air leakage carrying moisture; retarder in wrong place; no drying path | Review assembly and climate; check drying direction |
| Self-adhered membrane lifts | Dust, moisture, cold or low surface energy substrate | Primer, temperature and substrate preparation |
| Blisters or tears | Trapped moisture; mechanical damage | Inspect substrate and handling |
| Wet assembly despite a retarder | Two low-permeance layers trapping moisture | Check combined layers and drying potential |
Source basis: S4 for the double low-permeance caution; the remaining items are general practice.
D. Applications and qualification
18. How should a membrane be selected?
Define the assembly (wall or roof build-up), climate zone, interior conditions (for example high-humidity or cold-storage spaces), the control layers required by the code and design, the role assigned to each layer, and the penetrations and transitions. Then shortlist products with the data and accessories for those roles and check them in the assembly, not on a permeance number alone.
19. How should a membrane be qualified?
- Obtain air-permeance data (material and, where relevant, assembly) with methods and conditions.
- Obtain vapour-permeance data and the class by dry-cup and wet-cup methods as relevant.
- Have the design professional review placement, climate and drying potential.
- Define the tapes, sealants, flashings and details as a system.
- Build a mock-up; test assembly air leakage where required.
- Check the whole-building result after installation, for example with a blower-door test.
Source basis: S1 to S4; the sequence is general practice.
20. Which documents should be requested?
Technical data sheet with test methods, air-permeance and vapour-permeance reports, class statement, evaluation report or code listing where applicable, installation guide with transition and penetration details, accessory compatibility list, and warranty conditions.
21. What acceptance criteria are sensible?
Criteria belong to the project specification and code basis: material and assembly air-permeance limits, vapour-class requirements, mock-up pass and whole-building test limits where required. This page gives no project limits.
22. How should rolls be stored and handled?
Follow the manufacturer’s instructions: dry, covered, within temperature limits, rolls kept on end or as directed, and self-adhered products kept cool enough to avoid blocking. General practice statements only.
E. Procurement, comparisons and decisions
23. Which commercial formats are common?
Rolls in set widths and lengths, sheets, tapes and accessories, and fluid-applied products in pails or drums. Specify product, roll size, liner and accessory list.
24. What information is needed to request a quotation?
- Project location, code edition and climate zone.
- Assembly build-up and the role (air, vapour, water) assigned to the membrane.
- Interior conditions and any special humidity or temperature.
- Air-permeance and vapour-class data required.
- Accessories, details and quantities; roll sizes and destination.
Use the RFQ brief tool to assemble this in the browser.
25. What do purchasing teams usually ask?
Which data and test methods support the claims; whether tapes and details come as a tested system; what the warranty covers; minimum order and lead time; and who makes the membrane. Compare installed system cost, not only the roll price.
26. How should cost and performance be compared?
Compare installed cost per square metre including accessories and labour, the leakage risk of complex details and the cost of a failed blower-door test. A cheap membrane with poor accessories can cost more.
27. What regulatory and sustainability questions arise?
Energy codes increasingly require air-barrier continuity and testing; fire and flame-spread requirements may apply; substance declarations and recyclability depend on the product. This page makes no compliance declaration for any product.
28. What supplier qualification questions should be asked?
Who manufactures the membrane and accessories; what quality systems exist; how changes are notified; what training and site support are offered. See the supplier qualification checklist. PAXOMER does not confirm any supplier’s approvals or capacity on this page.
29. Which related pages should I read next?
- Guide: Construction membranes for the building envelope
- Comparison: Water-resistive barrier versus air barrier
- Related page: Water-resistive barriers
- Related page: PET spunbond roofing carriers
- Tool: Solution Finder
Manufacturing Regions & International Supply
No country-level manufacturing evidence specific to Air and Vapor Control Membranes was confirmed in the review.
- China: a company release documents a liquid-applied waterproofing membrane and mortar plant (R30). It is not listed, because air-barrier or vapour-retarder products at that site were not confirmed.
If you are evaluating manufacturers abroad, list in your RFQ brief the destination market, the documents you require and the delivery terms.
Engineering and purchasing FAQs
Each answer is general technical information, not a specification or a quotation.
Is an air barrier the same as a vapour barrier?
No. An air barrier limits air leakage and a vapour retarder limits diffusion. One product can do both, but each function must be supported by its own data.
What air permeance is acceptable?
A commonly quoted benchmark is 0.02 L/(s·m²) at 75 Pa for a material and 0.2 L/(s·m²) at 75 Pa for an assembly, from an ABAA document (material) and manufacturer statements (assembly). Your code and project specification set the limit.
What are vapour retarder classes?
The model code describes Class I as 0.1 perm or less, Class II above 0.1 up to 1.0 perm and Class III above 1.0 up to 10 perms by the dry-cup method. Which class is needed depends on the climate zone and assembly.
Should the vapour retarder go inside or outside?
It depends on climate, assembly and drying potential. Do not apply a rule of thumb; use the code options or an analysis.
Why does continuity matter so much for air barriers?
Air leaking through small gaps can carry much more moisture than diffusion. Laps, transitions and penetrations are where air barriers usually fail, which is why assembly testing includes them.
Can two vapour-retarding layers cause problems?
Yes. Two low-permeance layers can trap moisture in the assembly. A control-layer handout cautions against the “double Class II” situation unless analysis supports it.
Is a housewrap an air barrier?
Only if the product has air-permeance data, is installed and taped as a tested system, and the design assigns it that role. Many wraps are only water-resistive barriers.
What information is needed for a quotation?
Location, code edition and climate zone, assembly, role of the membrane, interior conditions, data required, accessories, roll sizes, volumes and destination.
Does PAXOMER supply specific air or vapour control membranes?
This page does not confirm stock, representation, supply or qualification for any product, and it gives no code advice. PAXOMER works in technical supply and manufacturer development; describe your application in an inquiry to discuss whether a suitable qualified manufacturer can be identified.
Technical References
References below were opened on the access date shown. A source supports only the statement it is cited for. Standards are cited by number and title from public catalogue entries; their full text was not read unless stated.
- S1. ASTM E2357: air leakage of air barrier assemblies. Henry Company (ASTM E2357 page). www.henry.com/resources/astm-e2357 (opens in a new tab) manufacturer literature · accessed 2026-10-27
Manufacturer page; secondary summary of the standard (assembly limit). - S2. ASTM E2178: air permeance of building materials. ANSI Webstore (ASTM E2178-21 listing), 2021. webstore.ansi.org/standards/astm/astme217821 (opens in a new tab) standard catalogue · accessed 2026-10-27
Catalogue listing of the material test method; the 0.02 figure was not confirmed from this listing. - S3. ICC Technical Note 06: vapour retarder classes. International Code Council (Technical Note TN06, vapor retarders). www.iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/proclamations/TN06-Vapor-Retarders_pdf.pdf (opens in a new tab) industry body · accessed 2026-10-27
Technical note citing the 2015 IRC; current edition not checked. - S4. Control layers: vapor barriers and retarders (handout). Penn State PHRC (webinar handout). www.phrc.psu.edu/assets/docs/Webinars/PHRCWebinar_Control-Layers-Vapor-Barriers- (opens in a new tab) technical literature · accessed 2026-10-27
Handout citing the 2015 IRC; undated. - S5. ABAA process for approval of air barrier materials: mechanically fastened commercial building wraps. Air Barrier Association of America (D-115-010 Rev 14 Part 3, mechanically fastened wraps), 2024. airbarrier.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/D-115-010-Rev-14-Part-3-Mech-fastened- (opens in a new tab) industry body · accessed 2026-10-27
Primary approval-criteria document for one product category; upload path dated August 2024; revision currency not checked. - S6. Air barrier materials and assemblies testing. Sto Corp (technical hotline TH 0910, air barrier materials and assemblies testing), 2009. www.stocorp.com/wp-content/content/Systems_TechService/Air%20and%20Moisture%20Ba (opens in a new tab) manufacturer literature · accessed 2026-10-27
Manufacturer technical note (the 0910 in the file name suggests September 2009; undated in the extract); describes E2178 and E2357 and one maker's results.
Evidence notes and limitations
What the information on this page does not establish. Confirm these points with the manufacturer, the current standard or the relevant authority before relying on them.
- The assembly limit (0.2 L/(s·m²) at 75 Pa) rests on manufacturer statements (S1, S6); the ABAA wrap document does not state it and the energy-code text was not read.
- The ABAA document is one product-category criterion (mechanically fastened commercial wraps); other categories may differ, and its revision currency was not checked.
- Vapour retarder classes and climate-zone options come from the 2015 IRC as summarised in ICC TN06; later IRC editions, the IECC and Canadian requirements were not checked, and the TN06 extraction reports Table 3 for cold climates only.
- Sheathing permeance values are generic examples from TN06 as extracted, not product data.
- ASTM E2178, E2357 and E96 themselves were not read; the ABAA document cites E2178-11 and the ANSI listing (S2) shows a later edition.
- The double-Class-II caution rests on S3 and S4, not on a hygrothermal analysis.
- Placement guidance beyond the sources is general practice.
- This page has not been independently technically reviewed or certified.
Facts checked against the cited sources
- ABAA material air-permeance limit, units, pressure and test method were read in S5.
- Assembly limit, E2357 specimen and loading protocol, and one maker's results were read in S6 and S1.
- Class I to III limits, E96 dry-cup basis, climate-zone options and sheathing permeance examples were read in S3.
- Continuity and control-layer statements were read in S4.
Where this connects to the full guide
The primary technical guide behind this page is Construction Membranes & Building Envelope Systems. All its topics are indexed below.
Topics in the full guide
- Quick answer
- What does this material system do in an industrial application?
- What do the product names and technical terms mean?
- What product types and classifications are available?
- How does material composition affect performance?
- How is the material manufactured and converted?
- Which technical properties affect application performance?
- Which grades, dimensions and specifications should buyers compare?
- Where is this material used in industry?
- Which requirements depend on the intended application?
See all 33 topics in the guide
Related guides, comparisons and tools
- Construction Membranes & Building Envelope Systems Primary guide
- Roofing Membranes & Underlayment
- Comparison: Water-resistive barrier versus air barrier
Glossary: Water-resistive barrier · Vapour permeance · Air-barrier continuity · Drainage plane · Flashing
Tools: Product Finder (Construction membranes and building-envelope materials) · Solution Finder (Membrane performance in a wall or roof) · Manufacturer Finder
How can I submit an inquiry?
Describe your application, the specifications above and the qualification stage. The material and this page are carried into the form for you. PAXOMER replies by email; the form does not confirm stock, representation or qualification.